Chapter 11 - Experimental Results of the Woodward Effect on a Micro-Newton Thrust Balance

HOME PAGE Web Site Contents Mars Report Contents Mars Report Abstract CV for Dr. David Roffman Diplomas PhD Thesis PhD Thesis Powerpoint Mars PowerPoint MSL Weather Reports MSL Weather Fall Yr 3 MSL Yr. 3 Summer Weather MSL Yr. 3 Spring Weather MSL Ultraviolet Desai, EDL, Parachutes & ExoMars Mars winter vs. summer temps Sea at Utopia Planitia, Mars Tree Stump at MSL? Spherical life on Mars? Mars Report Abstract, 1-1.2 Mars Report Sec.2-2.1 Report 2.2-2.4 Report 2.5-2.5.2 Report 2.5.3-2.7 Report 3-4.1.2 Report 5 to 6 Report  7-7.2.1 Report 8-9 Report 10-11 Report  12-12.2 Report 12.3-12.5 Report 13-14 Report 14.1 Report 14.2-14.3 Report 14.4-14.6 Report 15-18 Report Afterword Report References Rebuttal of REMS Report Running water on Mars MSL Year 1 Weather MSL Yr 2 Winter-Spring Weather MSL Yr 2 Summer Weather MSL Yr 2 Fall Weather MSL Yr 2-3 Winter Weather Adiabatics MSL Hi Temps MSL Low Temps Organic Chem found by MSL Oxygen in Mars Air MSL Day length & Temp Warm winter ground temps 155-Mile High Mars Plume Radiation Diurnal Air Temp Variation Mars Temps Fahrenheit Beagle found JPL/NASA Pressure Mistakes Enter MarsCorrect Sol 370, 1160 & 1161 Histories Mars-Radio-Show JPL Fudges Pressure Curves MSL Temp. ∆ Mast to Ground High & Low Pressures Normalized Mars soil 2% water Moving rock Mars MAVEN MSL Relative Humidity Claim Ashima Concedes Original MSL Weather Record Old MSL Weather Record MSL Summer Weather Pressure Estimate REMS Wind MSL Pressures REMS Reports Curiosity Geology CERN-2013-pics Daylight Math MSL Errors P1 MSL Errors P2 MSL-Chute-Flap MSL daylight Ashima Sols 15 to 111 Ashima Sol 112 to 226 Ashima Sol 227 on New Ashima Sols 270+ MSL Summer to Sol 316 Weather Forecast Wind Booms MSL Credibility MSL Temp. Swings MSL Temperatures Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) VL2 - MSL Ls Comparson Ashima MIT Mars GCM Dust Storm Nonsense Mars Slideshow Moving Sand & Martian Wind 3 DEC12 Press Conf. MSL Press Conf. 15NOV2012 Sol Numbering MSL Pressure Graph to Ls 218.8 MSL Sky Color Mars Sky Color DATA DEBATE! Zubrin's Letter Phoenix Vaisala Vaisala Pressure Sensors Phoenix &MSL Flawed MSL REMS Viking pressure sensors failed MSL landing site Mars Landings Phobos Grunt Martian Air Supersaturation Martian Secrets? Mars & CH4 Mars and MSL Time Viking Pressure Audit Links Mars Society 2008 Quant Finance Frontiers Home Front. Preface Frontiers Ch. 1 Frontiers Ch. 2 Antimatter Lightning Frontiers Ch. 3 Frontiers Ch. 4 Frontiers Ch. 5 Frontiers Ch. 6 Frontiers Ch. 7 Frontiers Ch. 8 Frontiers Ch. 9 Frontiers Ch 10 Frontiers Ch 11 Frontiers Ch 12 Frontiers Ch 13 Frontiers Ch 14 Frontiers Ch 15 Frontiers Ch 16 Frontiers Ch 17 Frontiers Ch 18 Frontiers Ch 19 Frontiers Ch 20 Frontiers Ch 21 Frontiers Ch 22 World Tour Spring-Break -13 Other Travels Asteroid Impact? ExoMars data Unit Issues Viking Pressures Tavis CADs Landing Long Scale Heights LS of Max/Min Pressures Tavis Report Tavis Failures Lander Altitude Martian Trees? Code Experiment Gedanken Report Mars Nuke? Martian Flares Mach Numbers MOLA (altitude) Original Mars Report Mariner 9 & Pressure Mars  Temps MSL Time MPF Pressure Blog Debates Spring Pendulum Plasma Model Reporting Errors Orbital Parameters Anderson Localization P. 1 Anderson Localization P. 2 Moving rock old Navigating Mars Mars Report Section Links Mars Report Figure Link Gillespie Lake rock outcrop MSL Sol 200 Anomaly Sol 1300&1301 Anomalies Gilbert Levin & Labeled Release Brine on Mars Ceres Lights Yr 1 Table 1 amfivan Missing data Mitchell Report Old Mars Report All MPF Temps ExoMars fails Did Spirit find past life? MSL ground temps go haywire Seasonal Pressure Altitude Calculations

Notes by David A Roffman on Chapter 11 of

FRONTIERS IN PROPULSION SCIENCE

Chapter by Nembo Buldrini (Research Scientist, Space and Propulsion Advanced Concepts)
and Martin  Tajmar (Head, Space and Propulsion Advanced Concepts)
Austrian Research Centers, GmbH-ARC, Seibersdorf, Austria
 

 

    Ten years before the new millennia, a scientist named James F. Woodward was starting to see signs that all matter is connected, and can interact over astronomical distances instantly.  Mach’s principle (in theoretical extension) was used to support this claim.  Chapter 11 is all about testing Woodward’s thrusters on a µN thrust balance in vacuums in order to find out the truth of his experiments.  Buldrini and Tajmar indicate results about an order of magnitude below Woodward’s past claims.  Such claims of linked matter have been put forth for some time.

     In 1953, Dennis Sciama demonstrated that inertial reaction force can be seen as a kind of radiation of action caused by distant objects on local objects.  Woodward would follow, with his equations to describe such behavior.  In the search for the mass fluctuation effect, no solid data has been found.  Based on the equations, predictions typically do not match results for experiments.  With the efforts to use Woodward’s equations for propulsion, other ideas have come forth.  Brito and Elaskar have decided to rely solely on electromagnetic effects.  These two believe in “hidden momentum,” and have built a thruster to check on Woodward’s thruster.

     The balance used in this experiment was made to measure an indium field emission electric propulsion thruster.  A force made by one such thruster can be in the micro-Newton range.  Two sensors were used.  One had longer range (but less accuracy) and the other was the opposite.  Dampeners were needed.  There was a counterweight to level the device.  Setup is based shown with a picture, but his chapter is not government owned (it is copyrighted).  All devices were based on Woodward’s equations, in which the unidirectional force should be achieved by fixing the mass fluctuations of the dielectric capacitor via the Lorentz force.  Whereas Woodward and Vandeventer recorded a thrust of 50 micro-Newtons, this was not seen in this experiment.  However, there were errors due to thermo-mechanical bending.  The device for this experiment produced 2 micro-Newtons, and not the 5 predicted by Woodward’s equations.  These results were for the Mach-5C device. 

     The next device to be tested was the Mach-6C.  It was more controllable than the 5C.  Woodward claimed it could generate 150 micro-Newtons of thrust.  Thermal errors were eliminated in this experiment.

    In another device, the Mach-6CP, the power cables were arranged differently, which may have caused trouble in measurement.  Woodward said that a thrust of between 100-200 micro-Newtons should be observed.  It was not.  The force may be a magnitude lower than Woodward said.  The “error” in this experiment (perhaps electrical leakage) is not Machian in nature.

    A separate device was latter built to test frequency and force.  The 2-MHz Breadboard Device had a dissipation factor one order of magnitude less than the other thir as well as devices in the previous paragraphs.  It was less vulnerable to overheating.  Also, the coils had a relative phase shift of 90 degrees, with allowed for maximum thrust (180 degrees is minimum thrust).  Here, a thrust of 1-6 mN was calculated, but none was observed.  However, the dielectric material used in this experiment may be unsuitable.  While there are some interesting results for some tests, further investigation is needed in this general area.  Recently Woodward has come to agreement, but said that his force was smaller than before.