Anderson Localization of Charge Carriers in Disordered Conductors (Part One)

HOME PAGE Web Site Contents Mars Report Contents Mars Report Abstract CV for Dr. David Roffman Diplomas PhD Thesis PhD Thesis Powerpoint Mars PowerPoint MSL Weather Reports Base on Mars? Seasonal Pressure Altitude Calculations Seismic Activity on Mars? Perserverance Weather Data MSL Years 5-6 Winter MSL Year 5 FALL MSL Year 5 Summer MSL Year 5 Spring MSL Years 4-5 Winter MSL Year 4 FALL MSL Year 4 Summer Weather MSL Year 4 Spring Weather MSL Yr 3-4 Winter Weather MSL Fall Yr 3 Weather MSL Yr. 3 Summer Weather MSL Yr. 3 Spring Weather Martian plume March 25 2017 MSL Ultraviolet 3 YEARS OF MSL UV Desai, EDL, Parachutes & ExoMars Mars winter vs. summer temps Helo to Mars Sea at Utopia Planitia, Mars Tree Stump at MSL? Spherical life on Mars? Mars Report Abstract, 1-1.2 Mars Report Sec.2-2.1 Report 2.2-2.4 Report 2.5-2.5.2 Report 2.5.3-2.7 Report 3-4 Report 4.1-4.1.2 Report 5 to 6 Report  7-7.2.1 Report 8 Report 9 Report 10 Report 11 Global Dust Storm Report 12 Report  13-13.2 Report 13.3-13.5 Report 13.6 Report 14-15 Report 15.1 Report 15.2-15.3 Report 15.4-15.6.2 Report - Report Report 16-16.1 Report 17-20 Report References Rebuttal of REMS Report Running water on Mars MSL Year 0 Weather MSL Yr 2 Winter-Spring Weather MSL Yr 2 Summer Weather MSL Yr 2 Fall Weather MSL Yr 2-3 Winter Weather Adiabatics MSL Hi Temps MSL Low Temps Organic Chem found by MSL Oxygen in Mars Air MSL Day length & Temp Warm winter ground temps 155-Mile High Mars Plume Radiation Diurnal Air Temp Variation Mars Temps Fahrenheit Beagle found JPL/NASA Pressure Mistakes Enter MarsCorrect Sol 370, 1160 & 1161 Histories Mars-Radio-Show JPL Fudges Pressure Curves MSL Temp. ∆ Mast to Ground High & Low Pressures Normalized Mars soil 2% water Moving rock Mars MAVEN MSL Relative Humidity Claim Ashima Concedes Original MSL Weather Record Old MSL Weather Record MSL Summer Weather Pressure Estimate REMS Wind MSL Pressures REMS Reports Curiosity Geology CERN-2013-pics Daylight Math MSL Errors P1 MSL Errors P2 MSL-Chute-Flap MSL daylight Ashima Sols 15 to 111 Ashima Sol 112 to 226 Ashima Sol 227 on New Ashima Sols 270+ MSL Summer to Sol 316 Updated Secrets of Mars Weather Forecast Wind Booms MSL Credibility MSL Temp. Swings MSL Temperatures Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) VL2 - MSL Ls Comparson Ashima MIT Mars GCM Dust Storm Nonsense Mars Slideshow Moving Sand & Martian Wind 3 DEC12 Press Conf. MSL Press Conf. 15NOV2012 Sol Numbering MSL Pressure Graph to Ls 218.8 MSL Sky Color Mars Sky Color DATA DEBATE! Zubrin's Letter Phoenix Vaisala Vaisala Pressure Sensors Phoenix &MSL Flawed MSL REMS Viking pressure sensors failed MSL landing site Mars Landings Phobos Grunt Martian Air Supersaturation Mars & CH4 Mars and MSL Time Viking Pressure Audit Links Mars Society 2008 Quant Finance Frontiers Home Front. Preface Frontiers Ch. 1 Frontiers Ch. 2 Antimatter Lightning Frontiers Ch. 3 Frontiers Ch. 4 Frontiers Ch. 5 Frontiers Ch. 6 Frontiers Ch. 7 Frontiers Ch. 8 Frontiers Ch. 9 Frontiers Ch 10 Frontiers Ch 11 Frontiers Ch 12 Frontiers Ch 13 Frontiers Ch 14 Frontiers Ch 15 Frontiers Ch 16 Frontiers Ch 17 Frontiers Ch 18 Frontiers Ch 19 Frontiers Ch 20 Frontiers Ch 21 Frontiers Ch 22 World Tour Spring-Break -13 Other Travels Asteroid Impact? ExoMars data Unit Issues Viking Pressures Tavis CADs Landing Long Scale Heights LS of Max/Min Pressures Tavis Report Tavis Failures Lander Altitude Martian Trees? Code Experiment Gedanken Report Mars Nuke? Martian Flares Mach Numbers MOLA (altitude) Original Mars Report Mariner 9 & Pressure Mars  Temps MSL Time MPF Pressure Blog Debates Spring Pendulum Plasma Model Reporting Errors Orbital Parameters Anderson Localization P. 1 Anderson Localization P. 2 Moving rock old Navigating Mars Mars Report Section Links Mars Report Figure Link Gillespie Lake rock outcrop MSL Sol 200 Anomaly Sol 1300&1301 Anomalies Gilbert Levin & Labeled Release Brine on Mars Ceres Lights Yr 1 Table 1 Missing data Mitchell Report Old Mars Report All MPF Temps ExoMars fails Did Spirit find past life? MSL ground temps go haywire OPACITY AT MSL Luminescence on Mars Dust Storms & Microorganisms 2018 Global Dust Storm Links to Sections of the Basic Report

Posted 12/1/2013

 Anderson Localization of Charge Carriers in Disordered Conductors

Review by David Roffman

I.            I. Introduction

    Anderson Localization is a QM phenomenon, with no classical analog.  The systems being considered in this paper are disordered conductors, meaning that the impurities occur randomly (this is not limited to non-Bravis lattice atoms being inserted, but also to random electronic and nuclear spins).  In Anderson Localization, the eigenmodes are altered from extended Bloch waves into being exponentially localized3.  The source of this localization is interference between multiple scatterings of the electrons by impurities (random defects in the potential).  So electrons stay on their sites.  When transport does occur, it is not the result of free carriers and scattering (like the Drude model’s scattering of electrons on lattice atoms), but from QM jumps from site to site (of electrons or their spins) 1.  However, the potential (periodic lattice and fluctuations on it) must be time independent.

     In the regime of localization the interference between scatters leads to weak conductance (in fact, a conductor could be turned into an insulator if the conditions are right).  For a coherent conductor having an overall conductance much greater than e2/h, the decrease in conductance is on the order of e2/h.  This regime of weak localization is broken by a low magnetic field (typically less than 100 G).  So one can experimentally see this effect via measuring magneto-resistance.  When transport occurs, it is sensitive to phase relaxation in addition to momentum relaxation.  Weak localization can be used to measure phase-relaxation length9 (pg.196). 

     If the Localization is strong (conductance less than 2e2/h), then the phase-coherent length is comparable to the localization length9 (pg.200).   Also there is a large fluctuation in the resistance if the scatters are moved or if the magnetic field or Fermi energy of the system changes; these last two change the wavelength of the electrons9 (pg.242).  Finally all work is this field is because of the original work by Anderson (Reference 1), and it is cited in all other papers that discuss this subject, so his original 1958 paper is heavily used to write this review report.

I.            II. Theory and Derivation

     The original Anderson paper postulates a theorem.  At low enough densities, there is no transport.  The wave functions become localized to a very small region of space.  He assumes that he forces fall off faster than 1/r3 as r -> infinity.  There is no contact with a heat reservoir in the model. 

     The Anderson model is the experimental situation of spin diffusion under conditions of what he calls “inhomogeneous broadening.”  Assume there are sites labeled j whose lattice spacing is periodic or random.  Each site j is occupied by a spin or particle (he chooses to focus on spins which are either up or down).  If a site is occupied, then the energy associated with this is Ej.  But this Ej is a stochastic variable whose distribution over the band of energies is given by probability distribution P(E)*dE.  It is parameterized by width W.  There is an interaction between sites (which is therefore like a spin-spin interaction).  The matrix element of this interaction is called Vjk(rjk).  This element has a meaning of transferring spin from one site to another and is allowed to have a probability distribution.

      He provides an example.  Consider 29Si with impurities.  The mobile entries are electron spins which are placed on impurity sites (color or donor centers).  The Ej’s are then the hyperfine interactions with the surrounding nuclei (The donors of 29Si and the Halide color centers).  The Vij allow a spin to flip and P(E) is linear. 

    The Anderson method is to put a single spin on site n at t =0 and look at the wave function at any later time.  He restates his theorem as follows “if V(rjk) falls off at large distances faster than 1/r3, and if the average value of V is less than a certain critical Vc of the order of magnitude W; then there is actually no transport at all, in the sense the even as t -> infinity the amplitude of the wave function around site n falls off rapidly with distance, the amplitude on site n itself remaining finite.”  There is no transport because of a matching issue.  The probability of finding other sites with the right energy for transport increases much more slowly than the strength of the interaction V(rjk) as a function of distance.

     Anderson also mentions the two regimes where Anderson Localization doesn’t occur and hence transport is allowed.    Where V falls off as 1/r3 (“strong” interactions) and V~W (“high” densities).

     A brief summary of the derivation is to follow.  The task is to solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for site j at time t.  That is:

Suppose |aj(0)|2 is known and localized to a certain region of Ej or rj.  The question is, how fast (if it even occurs) does this probability distribution diffuse away from this region?  The simplest case is to say that for the j = 0, a0(0) = 1 and ask for aj(t).  Also lim(s*fj(s), s-> 0+) = <aj(∞)>Av.  This problem is solved by iteration.  Equation 4 is solved in terms of f0(s) (for the equations which didn’t involve f0(s)).

     There are two important equations which will be mentioned later (equation 8 is the first term of equation 7):

Solving for f0(s), if τ is finite, then one arrives at equation 10A:

In this case, the energy is the same as in equation 10A, but this energy state doesn’t decay.  The amplitude a0(∞) is reduced from unity by 1/(1+K).  K measures how much spread has occurred in the state to its neighbors by virtual transitions.  But no real transport has occurred.

     Study equation 7 to look at the behavior of Vc(s).  This variable is probabilistic.  Pick a starting atom called 0 and arbitrary energy E (the imaginary part of s) and examine the probability distribution of Vc.  Anderson poses 3 questions/subjects of interest which become the thrust of much of the rest of his paper: study the 1st term of equation 8, look at the convergence of the series higher order perturbations (that is, beyond 2nd order), and if these convergences are meaningful (whether the arbitrary choice of energy is correct or not).

     To study the 1st term of equation 8, consider the following:

which represents successive virtual transitions.  Certain terms are very large because there is no restriction of repeated indices.  Simply put, ban repeated indices and it’s OK. So Equation 13 becomes:  

Part two of this article is continued HERE.