Higher than Advertised Martian Air Pressure - Part 1

HOME PAGE CONTENTS Mars Pressure Abstract & Links Mars Slideshow DATA DEBATE! Physics Degree Resume' (2011) Zubrin's Letter Moving Sand & Martian Wind Parachutes&EDL Mars Report 1 Mars Report 2 Mars Report 3 Mars Report 4 Mars Report 5/ Occultation Mars Report 6 Mars Report 7 Mars Report 8 Mars Report 9 Mars Report 10 Mars Landings Phobos Grunt Martian Air Supersaturation Martian Secrets? Mars & CH4 Mars Time Viking Pressure Audit Links Full Proof Mars Society 2008 Frontiers Home Front. Preface Frontiers Ch. 1 Frontiers Ch. 2 Antimatter Lightning Frontiers Ch. 3 Frontiers Ch. 4 Frontiers Ch. 5 Frontiers Ch. 6 Frontiers Ch. 7 Frontiers Ch. 8 Frontiers Ch. 9 Frontiers Ch 10 Frontiers Ch 11 Frontiers Ch 12 Frontiers Ch 13 Frontiers Ch 14 Frontiers Ch 15 Frontiers Ch 16 Frontiers Ch 17 Frontiers Ch 18 Frontiers Ch 19 Frontiers Ch 20 Frontiers Ch 21 Frontiers Ch 22 World Tour Other Travels Asteroid Impact? Unit Issues Viking Pressures Tavis CADs Phoenix Vaisala Scale Heights Viking Pressures Tavis Report Tavis Failures Lander Altitude Mars Sky Color Code Experiment Gedanken Report Mars Nuke? Martian Flares Mach Numbers MOLA (altitude) Original Mars Report Mariner 9 & Pressure Mars  Temps Contact MPF Pressure Blog Debates Spring Pendulum Plasma Model

By David A. Roffman, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. 3/11/2012

HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED

MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE

By David A. Roffman and Barry S. Roffman

 

ABSTRACT FOR PART 1 – THE BASIC REPORT BY DAVID A. ROFFMAN: The enigma of dust devils/storms on Mars (with a near-vacuum pressure rated at 6.1 mbar at areoid) is cause to question accuracy of accepted pressure values. The Basic Report includes reviews of NASA-archived historical documents, analysis of technical papers, personal interviews of pressure transducer designers, and a brief discussion of an in depth audit of Viking pressure and temperature data (see Annexes A through F for detailed audit results). Only four landers attempted to directly measure pressure – two Vikings, Pathfinder, and Phoenix. Accepted pressures are based on their data and radio occultation/spectroscopy by orbiters. Viking transducers were only rated at 18 mbar (Pathfinder and Phoenix at 12 mbar). Both Vikings showed consistent daily pressure spikes at the same times. They are highly correlated with how gas pressure in a sealed container would vary with Absolute temperature. Pressure fluctuations are linked to heating by radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) or other heat-generating electronic operating cycles. When the heaters were most needed there was less than a 2% difference for predicted and reported pressures. The formula employed assumes a clogged air access tube/dust filter.

       Radio occultation-derived pressures are discussed, as are Pathfinder and Phoenix wind speed measurement failures. Phoenix pressure transducer design problems are highlighted with respect to confusion about dust filter location, and lack of information about nearby heat sources due to International Traffic and Arms Regulations. Further pressure questions arise from high densities encountered during aerobraking operations (particularly over the South Pole). Spectroscopy for pressure did not work over ice there. NASA could not replicate dust devils at 10 mbar without employing wind speeds 11+ times greater than associated with Martian dust devils. Sand dunes observed from HIRISE, and rapidly filled MER Spirit tracks indicated sand movement that would require wind speeds of 80 mph at the assumed low pressures. These winds were not seen at either Viking, indicating higher pressures than recorded. Spiral clouds with ~10 km-wide eye walls are seen on and over Arsia Mons where pressure was thought to be ~1 mbar. Future transducers require wider pressure range sensitivity and a way to replace dust filters and keep air access tubes clear. 

NOTE: The PDF version of this report is currently the official version.  Links to it are listed below. The Annexes and Appendices are currently only available in PDF form at the links below, however Word or Excel versions are available for researchers upon request at DavidARoffman@Gmail.Com. The Basic Report is offered in 10 parts starting after the PDF links here. The 10 parts are in need of an update as of March 8, 2012 due to the posting of the new PDF versons. These updates should be finished before March 31, 2012. 

PowerPoint Summary of HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE - Part 1 by David A. Roffman. Posted February 21, 2012.

 

PowerPoint Summary of HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE - PART 2 by Barry S. Roffman.  Posted August 18 2011.

 

BASIC REPORT for HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE by David A. Roffman and Barry S. Roffman. Updated March 11, 2012. 

 

Abstract of the Audit of the Viking Project Pressure Data and ANNEX A to HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE. Viking 1 Morning Pressure and Temperature Changes. Posted March 7, 2012.

 

ANNEX B to HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE. Viking 2 Morning Pressure and Temperature Changes, Posted March 7, 2012.

ANNEX C to HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE. Viking 2 Stuck Pressure Gauge. Posted March 7, 2012.

ANNEX D to HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE.  Percent Differences between Measured Pressures on Viking 1 and Gay-Lussac/ Amonton’s Law-Based Predictions. Posted March 7, 2012. 

ANNEX E TO HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE.  Measured vs. Predicted Pressure Percent Differences for Viking-1 Time-bins 0.3 and 0.34. Posted March 7, 2012. 

ANNEX F to HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE. Percent Difference Flow Chart for Viking-1 Sols 1 to 113, and 134 to 350. Posted March 7, 2012. 

ANNEX G to HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE.  Tavis Transducer Specifications and Test Results, Posted March 7, 2012.

ANNEX H to HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE. Calibration Efforts for the Mars Pathfinder Tavis Pressure Transducer and IMP Windsock Experiment. Posted March 7, 2012.



PowerPoint Summary of HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE - Part 1 by David A. Roffman. Updated December 6, 2011.

 

PowerPoint Summary of HIGHER THAN ADVERTISED MARTIAN AIR PRESSURE - PART 2 by Barry S. Roffman.  Posted August 18, 2011.

 

Higher Than Advertised Martian Air Pressure

Part 1 – Basic Report Overview of Pressure Measurement Issues

 David A. Roffman

Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

DavidARoffman@GMail.Com


ABSTRACT: The enigma of dust devils/storms on Mars with a near-vacuum pressure rated at 6.1 mbar at areoid is cause to question accuracy of accepted pressure values. The Basic Report includes reviews of NASA-archived historical documents, analysis of technical papers, personal interviews of pressure transducer designers, and a brief discussion of an in depth audit of Viking pressure and temperature data (see Annexes for detailed audit results). Only four landers attempted to measure pressure – two Vikings, Pathfinder, and Phoenix. Accepted pressures are based on their data and radio occultation/spectroscopy by orbiters. Viking transducers were only rated at 18 mbar (Pathfinder and Phoenix at 12 mbar). Both Vikings showed consistent daily pressure spikes at the same times. They are highly correlated with how gas pressure in a sealed container would vary with Absolute temperature. Pressure fluctuations are linked to heating by radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) or other heat-generating electronic operating cycles. When the heaters were most needed there was less than a 2% difference for predicted and reported pressures. The formula employed assumes a clogged air access tube/dust filter.

       Radio occultation-derived pressures are discussed, as are Pathfinder and Phoenix wind speed measurement failures. Phoenix pressure transducer design problems are highlighted with respect to confusion about dust filter location, and lack of information about nearby heat sources due to International Traffic and Arms Regulations. Further pressure questions arise from high densities encountered during aerobraking operations (particularly over the South Pole). Spectroscopy for pressure did not work over ice there. NASA could not replicate dust devils at 10 mbar without employing wind speeds 11+ times greater than associated with Martian dust devils. Sand dunes observed from HIRISE, and rapidly filled MER Spirit tracks indicated sand movement that would require wind speeds of 80 mph at the assumed low pressures. These winds were not seen at either Viking, indicating higher pressures than recorded. Spiral clouds with ~10 km-wide eye walls are seen on and over Arsia Mons where pressure was thought to be ~1 mbar. Future transducers require wider pressure range sensitivity and a way to replace dust filters and keep air access tubes clear.

 

Higher Than Advertised Martian Air Pressure

Part 2 – Audit of Viking Pressure Data

 Barry S. Roffman (Lieutenant, USCG, Ret)

ArkHunt@Juno.Com

 

ABSTRACT: After a cursory review of the Viking Project Data it became apparent that an extensive audit was imperative. The Viking Project Data did not seem to explain weather phenomena (spiral clouds over Arsia Mons, dust devils, etc.) clearly seen on Mars. A general discussion of the problems is offered in the Basic Report by David Roffman. The data audit results are presented in seven Annexes. The Viking Project data divides every Martian day into 25 time-bins (hours), each ~59 minutes long. Annex A (Viking 1 sols 1 to 350) and Annex B (Viking 2 sols 156 to 361) emphasize how pressures change during morning time-bins that correspond to 0630 to 0830. A simple formula, Pressure predicted = (6.51 mbar*255.77 K)/Temperature K measured, was often correct for 0730. Annex C examines how often the pressure sensor did not work (stuck or no pressures) between Viking 2 sols 639 and 799. Annex D examines the percent differences between hourly predictions and reported pressures for Viking 1 from sols 1 to 350. Annex E focuses on predictions and reported pressures for the 0.3 (0730) and .34 (0830) time-bins. Annex F maps out the best and worst prediction times each day, clearly proving the influence of the RTG heaters on hourly pressure reports. Annex G shows what went wrong in the transducer selection and testing process. These Annexes provide hard evidence that the Tavis pressure transducers used for the Vikings (and Pathfinder) likely jammed with dust during the landing process. The meaning of this is that it is doubtful that they ever measured ambient pressure conditions of Mars.  There is evidence that all subsequent attempts to measure pressure were colored by the reported Viking results. Problems with Phoenix pressures based on a Vaisala transducer are discussed in the Basic Report.

 

Draft PDF of the PowerPoint for the above presentation on the Audit of Viking Pressure Data. 

1. INTRODUCTION TO PART 1.

 

Mars has long fascinated humanity and often been seen as a possible safe harbor for life.  In July, 1964 that hope was dealt a crushing blow by Mariner 4.  Images taken and data obtained from no closer than 9,846 km showed a heavily cratered, cold, and dead world. Air pressures are posted on a NASA site as estimated at 4.1 to 7 mbar, (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/mars/mariner.html) although A. J. Kliore (1974) of JPL listed the Mariner 4-derived pressure range as 4.5 to 9 mbar. The different figures indicated by Government sources in my initial search of essential information were often a problem. Mariner 4 saw daytime temperatures of -100o C, with no magnetic field.  Mariners 6, 7 and 9 got closer but still did not give us a picture that was much friendlier.  Mariner estimates for pressure, based on radio occultation, spanned a range of 1 or 2.8 to 10.3 mbar.  All pressure estimates were close to a vacuum when compared to average pressure on (1,013.25 mbar). However from a distance of 1,650 km, after a dust storm that obscured everything upon its arrival in orbit, Mariner 9 could see evidence of wind and water erosion, fog, and weather fronts.  When Vikings 1 and 2 landed, we learned that there is a high frequency of dust devils on Mars too.  Phoenix witnessed snow falling. The HIRISE and MER Spirit showed unexpected bedform (sand dune and ripple) movement (Bridges et al., 2011).

All landers agreed that pressure at their respective locations was somewhere between 6.5 and 10.72 mbar (Viking 2 sol 277.34 at Ls 279.93), but these low pressures make it very hard to explain the weather plainly seen.  This is particularly true of dust devils and blowing sand.

     This report will reexamine in detail currently held beliefs about Martian air pressure and offer suggestions about why these beliefs might by inaccurate.  The report is divided into the following sections (with links provided for the other pages required for Parts 2 thru 10).
 
THIS WEB PAGE (PART 1) 
 
ABSTRACT
1. INTRODUCTION
   1.1 Comparison of Martian and terrestrial dust devils
     1.1.1 Geographic Occurrences and the Greenhouse and Thermophoresis Effect
     1.1.2 Seasonal Occurrences and Electrical Properties
     1.1.3. Size and Shape
     1.1.4. Diurnal Formation Rate and Lifetime
     1.1.5 Wind Speeds
     1.1.6 Core Temperature Excursions
     1.1.7 Dust Particle Size - The Problem of Martian Dust <2 Microns and Wind Speeds.
     1.1.8. Core Pressure Excursions
   1.2. NASA Ames Test of Martian Pressures and Dust Devils


PART 2:

2. OVERVIEW OF INSTRUMENTATION PROBLEMS
   2.1 Viking 2 and Gay-Lussac’s Law

PART 3:   

   2.2 Pathfinder and Phoenix Pressure Issues
   2.3. Which Transducers Were Used?
   2.4. Issues Raised by the FMI
   2.5 The Dust filter on Viking
      2.5.1. The issue of Viking pressure reports and digitization

 PART 4:

2.5.1. The issue of Viking pressure reports and digitization
     2.5.2. The issue of daily pressure spikes at consistent time-bins
3. CAVES ON AND SPIRAL CLOUDS ABOVE ARSIA MONS ON MARS
4. THE ISSUES OF SNOW, WATER ICE, AND CARBON DIOXIDE ON MARS
   4.1. Annual Pressure Fluctuations Recorded by Viking 1, Viking 2, and Phoenix -   Maximum Pressure in the Northern Winter?

PART 5: 

 

5. RADIO OCCULTATION

5.1 Shifting Standards - The Relationship of the MOLA Topography of Mars to the Mean Atmospheric Pressure.

 

PART 6:

 

6.  SPECTROSCOPY PRESSURE READINGS BY MARS EXPRESS ORBITER.
   

PART 7: 

 

7.  MARTIAN WIND PROBLEMS
   7.1 Anemometer/Telltale Wind Speed Issues
   7.2 Martian Bedforms – Too Much Movement of Sand Dunes and Ripples for 6.1 mbar
   7.2.1 Issues Raised by the paper on Planet-wide sand motion on Mars by Bridges et al. (2012)
 

 

PART 8:

 

8. DO DOWNRANGE LANDINGS MEAN THINNER OR THICKER AIR?

 

 

PART 9:

 

9. DUST OPACITY AND PRESSURE
10. EXCESSIVE DECELERATION DURING AEROBRAKING OPERATIONS
   10.1 Mars Global Surveyor (MGS)
   10.2 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) 
11. WOULD TAVIS OR VAISALA TRANSDUCERS PEG OUT AT THEIR MAXIMUM PRESSURES?
12.  THE POTENTIAL PRESSURE ON MARS
   12.1 Did NASA Ever Publically Back 20 Mbar on Mars? 
   12.2 Biology and Martian Air Pressure

 PART 10:

13. CONCLUSIONS
14. RECOMMENDATIONS
15. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
16. REFERENCES

1. INTRODUCTION

Mars has long fascinated humanity and often been seen as a possible safe harbor for life.  In July 1964 that hope was dealt a crushing blow by Mariner 4.  Images taken and data obtained from no closer than 9,846 km showed a heavily cratered, cold, and dead world. Air pressures are posted on a NASA site as estimated at 4.1 to 7 mbar, (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/mars/mariner.html) although A. J. Kliore (1974) of JPL listed the Mariner 4-derived pressure range as 4.5 to 9 mbar. The different figures indicated by Government sources in my initial search of essential information were often a problem. Mariner 4 saw daytime temperatures of -100o C, with no magnetic field.  Mariners 6, 7 and 9 got closer but still did not give us a picture that was much friendlier.  Mariner estimates for pressure, based on radio occultation, spanned a range of 1 or 2.8 to 10.3 mbar.  The important differences in minimal pressure will be elaborated on further in Section 5.  However all pressure estimates were close to a vacuum when compared to what we see on Earth (average pressure 1,013.25 mbar). Even from a distance of 1,650 km, after a dust storm that obscured everything upon its arrival in orbit, Mariner 9 could see evidence of wind and water erosion, fog, and weather fronts.  When Vikings 1 and 2 landed, we learned that there is a high frequency of dust devils on Mars too.  Moreover, Phoenix witnessed snow falling. 

All landers agreed that pressure at their respective locations was somewhere between 6.5 and 10.72 mbar (Viking 2 sol 277.34 at Ls 279.93), but these low pressures make it very hard to explain the weather plainly seen.  This is particularly true of dust devils.

1.1. Comparison of Martian and terrestrial dust devils 

Dust devils on Earth and Mars are similar with respect to geographic formation regions, seasonal occurrences, electrical properties, size, shape, diurnal formation rate, lifetime and frequency of occurrence, wind speed, core temperature excursions, and dust particle size.  The only significant differences lie in measured absolute and   relative pressure excursions in the cores of Martian and terrestrial dust devils. Clogged dust filters/pressure equalization ports on landers may have diminished accuracy of dust devil pressure excursion measurements (see sections 2.1 through 2.4 below).

1.1.1 Geographic Occurrences and the Greenhouse and Thermophoresis Effect 

Thousands of dust devils per week occur in the Peruvian Andes near the Subancaya volcano (Metzger, 2001) which is 5,900 meters high. Dust devils are also seen in abundance on a Martian volcano, Arsia Mons.  But the base altitude of some dust devils there has been about 17,000 meters.  Such an altitude on Mars supposedly would have about 1.2 mbar pressure, compared to about 478 mbar at Subancaya on Earth.  Reis et al. (2009) state that 28 active dust devils were reported in their study region for Arsia Mons, with 11 of them at altitudes greater than 16 km, and most inside the caldera (see Figure 1).  They don't fully understand how particles that are a few microns in size can be lifted there, and state that 1 mbar “requires wind speeds 2-3 times higher than at the Mars mean elevation for particle entanglement.”

Reis et al. (2009) suggest a greenhouse-thermophoretic (GT) effect that they believe explains ~1 mbar dust lifting at Arsia Mons. Their article states that “Laboratory and microgravity experiments show that the light flux needed for lift to occur is in the same range as that of solar insolation available on Mars.” They concede that high altitude dust devils do not follow the season of maximum insolation, but indicate that the GT-effect would be strongest around pressures of 1 mbar. However, if anything we would expect such dust lifted at high altitude to just drift away.  The GT effect simply does not explain the structure of these events at high altitude, or why the dust rotates in columns that precisely match dust devils produced at lower altitudes.  Further, Figure 1 shows that dust devils form at successively lower levels (i.e., higher pressures) as altitudes decline from 17 km to about 7 km, so there is nothing unique about reaching the ~1 mbar-level at the top of Arsia Mons. 

Figure 1 - The diagram on the left above shows active dust devils seen on Arsia Mons. The image on the right is there to show where Arsia Mons is found in the Mars’ Tharsis Volcanic Province.

1.1.2. Seasonal occurrences.  Dust devils usually occur in the regional summer on Earth.  On Mars their tracks are most often spotted during regional spring and summer (Balme et al., 2003).

 

1.1.3. Electrical Properties 

 

There are indications that there may be high voltage electric fields associated with Martian dust devils. Such fields would mirror terrestrial dust devils, where estimates are as large as 0.8 MV for one such event (Farrell et al., 2004).

 

1.1.4. Size and Shape

 

About 8% of terrestrial dust devils exceed 300 m in height.  Bell (1967) reports some seen from the air that are 1,000-2,500 m high. Mars orbiters have shown dust devils there often are a few kilometers high and hundreds of meters in diameter, outdoing the larger terrestrial events in height. Martian dust devils can be up to 50 times as wide and 10 times as high as terrestrial dust devils (Smith & Nilton, 2001). But there are many smaller Martian dust devils. A NASA Spirit press release (8/19/2005) stated, “Martian and terrestrial dust devils are similar in morphology and can be extremely common.”  

 

1.1.5. Diurnal Formation Rate and Lifetime

 

About 80 convective vortices were recorded by Pathfinder.  Most occurred between 1200 and 1300 Local True Solar Time (Murphy & Nellis, 2002). On Earth noon is about the peak time. While dust devils may deposit the bulk of the dust responsible for the color of the Martian sky, it is also claimed that they might cause up to two thirds of all windblown dust for particles under 25 microns in the U.S., and (in the southwest) could be a major cause of poor air quality (Gillette and Sinclair, 1990).

 

1.1.6 Wind Speed of Tornadoes and Dust Devils 

 

The most powerful dust devil recorded by Mars Express Orbiter between January 2004 and July 2006 had a speed of 59 m/s (132 mph).  This is comparable in speed to an F2 tornado.  If the Martian atmospheric pressures are as low as advertised, these storms would not be so worrisome.  However, NASA must be certain of the pressures involved before risking lives of human explorers there.

Stanzel et al. (2008) assert that dust devil velocities were directly measured from orbit, and range from (only) 1 meter per second to 59 m/s.  These velocities convert to about 2.2 miles per hour on the low end to 132 miles per hour on the high end.  Even on the high end, we do not see the 70 m/s required to lift dust by a NASA Ames apparatus discussed below in section 1.2.

 

1.1.7 Core Temperature Excursions

 

Balme and Greeley (2006) state, “Positive temperature excursions in vortices measured by Viking and MPF landers had maximum values of 5-6 K. These values are similar to terrestrial measurements.”  However they note low sampling rates on Mars, and state, “Temperature excursions <10ºC are found consistently, but measurements with an order of magnitude higher sampling rate show temperature excursions as great as 20ºC.”  Ellehoj et al. (2009)  indicate that core excursions for Martian dust devils can be up to 10 K (ºC).

 

1.1.8 Dust Particle Size - The Problem of Martian Dust <2 Microns and Wind Speeds

 

Balme and Greeley (2006) also state, “The Martian atmosphere is thinner than Earth’s… so much higher wind speeds are required to pick up sand or dust on Mars.  Wind tunnel studies have shown that, like Earth, particles with diameter 80-100 μm (fine sand) are the easiest to move, having the lowest static threshold friction velocity, and that larger and smaller particles require stronger winds to entrain them into the flow.  However, much of Mars’ atmospheric dust load is very small, and the boundary layer wind speeds required to entrain such fine material are in excess of those measured at the surface (Magalhaes et al., 1999). Nevertheless, fine dust is somehow being injected into the atmosphere to support the observed haze and to supply local… and global… dust storms.” 

 

The problem of dust particle size is more serious than indicated above.  Optimum particle size for direct lifting by the wind (with the lowest threshold velocity) is around 90 μm. This requires a wind at 5 meters altitude to be around 30-40 m/s. For smaller particles like the 1 μm size dust typically suspended in the air over Mars, the threshold velocity is extremely high, requiring enormous wind speeds (>500 m/s) at 5 m altitude which would never occur.  As 500 m/s = 1,118 miles per hour, it is argued that saltation must be crucial to the lifting of very small particles into the air (Read and Lewis, 2004, 190).

What is saltation?  Bagnold (1954) indicated that large particles that are temporarily lifted into the air by surface winds would quickly fall out by sedimentation. On impact with the surface, they may dislodge smaller particles and lift them into the air.  As for what velocity fine about sand (~ 100 μm) would have on impact, it is only about 50 to 80 cm per second which is about 1.12 to 1.79 miles per hour (Read and Lewis, 2004, 197).

 

1.1.9. Core Pressure Excursions 

 

Roy E. Wyatt (1954) of the Weather Bureau Regional Office in Salt Lake City, Utah reported that a small, approximately 50-foot high, 50 to 60 foot wide dust devil had its center pass within 8-10 feet of a microbarograph on August 12, 1953 in St. George, Utah (Figure 2) at an altitude of 2,951 feet above sea level. A drop from 26.98 inches of mercury (913.644 mbar) to 26.94 inches of mercury (912.289 mbar) was recorded.  This 1.355 mbar drop in pressure equals 0.148%.

Balme and Greeley (2006) report that Pathfinder “identified 79 possible convective vortices from pressure data.” Recorded pressure drops were from ~0.075% to ~0.75%.   Figure 3 shows dust devils events for Pathfinder and Phoenix. If we examine the pressure drop seen by Phoenix from 8.425 to 8.422 mbar, that 0.003 mbar pressure drop is only about 0.036%. The Pathfinder event shows a drop in pressure from about 6.735 to 6.705 mbar (0.03 mbar). That is about a 0.445% drop. While the percent pressure drop is larger on the Pathfinder event than the Utah event, it was smaller for the Phoenix event. So absolute and percent pressure drops on Mars are producing almost the exact same storms, indeed often bigger storms, than we see on Earth. It might be argued that pressure is smaller on Mars; but so too is kinetic energy. Clearly, as we approach a vacuum, if we are going to see weather events based on pressure differences, there should be at least the same size percent pressure drops to drive them, not smaller ones.  However, most telling is that while the percent drops on Martian dust devils appear to overlap their terrestrial cousins, Viking 1 and 2 almost always saw much larger pressure increases each sol about 7:30 AM local time with increases up to 0.62 mbar from the previous hour at that time.

Figure 4 offers evidence that internal events on the Vikings were having a much greater impact on pressure readings than dramatics events like dust devils. Pressure increases at the 0.26 to 0.3 time-bins were comparable to pressure drops associated with global dust storms. An increase of 0.62 mbar in about 59 minutes that makes up one time-bin equates to a pressure rise 13 times greater than the largest (0.477 mbar) pressure fall shown for all 79 Pathfinder dust devil events, and about 21 times greater than the largest (.0289 mbar) pressure drop seen for a Phoenix dust devil.

 

Figure 2 – Dust devil pressure drop at the Weather Bureau Regional Office in Salt Lake City, Utah. It reported that a small, approximately 50-foot high, 50-60 foot wide dust devil had its center pass 8-10 feet from a microbarograph on August 12, 1953 in St. George, Utah.

1.1.3. Electrical Properties 

 

There are indications that there may be high voltage electric fields associated with Martian dust devils. Such fields would mirror terrestrial dust devils, where estimates are as large as 0.8 MV for one such event (Farrell et al., 2004).

 

1.1.4. Size and Shape

 

About 8% of terrestrial dust devils exceed 300 m in height.  Bell (1967) reports some seen from the air that are 1,000-2,500 m high. Mars orbiters have shown dust devils there often are a few kilometers high and hundreds of meters in diameter, outdoing the larger terrestrial events in height. Martian dust devils can be up to 50 times as wide and 10 times as high as terrestrial dust devils (Smith & Nilton, 2001). But there are many smaller Martian dust devils. A NASA Spirit press release (8/19/2005) stated, “Martian and terrestrial dust devils are similar in morphology and can be extremely common.”  

 

1.1.5. Diurnal Formation Rate and Lifetime

 

About 80 convective vortices were recorded by Pathfinder.  Most occurred between 1200 and 1300 Local True Solar Time (Murphy & Nellis, 2002). On Earth noon is about the peak time. While dust devils may deposit the bulk of the dust responsible for the color of the Martian sky, it is also claimed that they might cause up to two thirds of all windblown dust for particles under 25 microns in the U.S., and (in the southwest) could be a major cause of poor air quality (Gillette and Sinclair, 1990).

 

1.1.6 Wind Speed of Tornadoes and Dust Devils 

 

The most powerful dust devil recorded by Mars Express Orbiter between January 2004 and July 2006 had a speed of 59 m/s (132 mph).  This is comparable in speed to an F2 tornado.  If the Martian atmospheric pressures are as low as advertised, these storms would not be so worrisome.  However, NASA must be certain of the pressures involved before risking lives of human explorers there.

Stanzel et al. (2008) assert that dust devil velocities were directly measured from orbit, and range from (only) 1 meter per second to 59 m/s.  These velocities convert to about 2.2 miles per hour on the low end to 132 miles per hour on the high end.  Even on the high end, we do not see the 70 m/s required to lift dust by a NASA Ames apparatus discussed below in section 1.2.

 

1.1.7 Core Temperature Excursions

 

Balme and Greeley (2006) state, “Positive temperature excursions in vortices measured by Viking and MPF landers had maximum values of 5-6 K. These values are similar to terrestrial measurements.”  However they note low sampling rates on Mars, and state, “Temperature excursions <10ºC are found consistently, but measurements with an order of magnitude higher sampling rate show temperature excursions as great as 20ºC.”  Ellehoj et al. (2009)  indicate that core excursions for Martian dust devils can be up to 10 K (ºC).

 

1.1.8 Dust Particle Size - The Problem of Martian Dust <2 Microns and Wind Speeds

 

Balme and Greeley (2006) also state, “The Martian atmosphere is thinner than Earth’s… so much higher wind speeds are required to pick up sand or dust on Mars.  Wind tunnel studies have shown that, like Earth, particles with diameter 80-100 μm (fine sand) are the easiest to move, having the lowest static threshold friction velocity, and that larger and smaller particles require stronger winds to entrain them into the flow.  However, much of Mars’ atmospheric dust load is very small, and the boundary layer wind speeds required to entrain such fine material are in excess of those measured at the surface (Magalhaes et al., 1999). Nevertheless, fine dust is somehow being injected into the atmosphere to support the observed haze and to supply local… and global… dust storms.” 

 

The problem of dust particle size is more serious than indicated above.  Optimum particle size for direct lifting by the wind (with the lowest threshold velocity) is around 90 μm. This requires a wind at 5 meters altitude to be around 30-40 m/s. For smaller particles like the 1 μm size dust typically suspended in the air over Mars, the threshold velocity is extremely high, requiring enormous wind speeds (>500 m/s) at 5 m altitude which would never occur.  As 500 m/s = 1,118 miles per hour, it is argued that saltation must be crucial to the lifting of very small particles into the air (Read and Lewis, 2004, 190).

What is saltation?  Bagnold (1954) indicated that large particles that are temporarily lifted into the air by surface winds would quickly fall out by sedimentation. On impact with the surface, they may dislodge smaller particles and lift them into the air.  As for what velocity fine about sand (~ 100 μm) would have on impact, it is only about 50 to 80 cm per second which is about 1.12 to 1.79 miles per hour (Read and Lewis, 2004, 197).

 

1.1.9. Core Pressure Excursions 

 

Roy E. Wyatt (1954) of the Weather Bureau Regional Office in Salt Lake City, Utah reported that a small, approximately 50-foot high, 50 to 60 foot wide dust devil had its center pass within 8-10 feet of a microbarograph on August 12, 1953 in St. George, Utah (Figure 2 above) at an altitude of 2,951 feet above sea level. A drop from 26.98 inches of mercury (913.644 mbar) to 26.94 inches of mercury (912.289 mbar) was recorded.  This 1.355 mbar drop in pressure equals 0.148%.

Balme and Greeley (2006) report that Pathfinder “identified 79 possible convective vortices from pressure data.” Recorded pressure drops were from ~0.075% to ~0.75%.   Figure 3 shows dust devils events for Pathfinder and Phoenix. If we examine the pressure drop seen by Phoenix from 8.425 to 8.422 mbar, that 0.003 mbar pressure drop is only about 0.036%. The Pathfinder event shows a drop in pressure from about 6.735 to 6.705 mbar (0.03 mbar). That is about a 0.445% drop. While the percent pressure drop is larger on the Pathfinder event than the Utah event, it was smaller for the Phoenix event. So absolute and percent pressure drops on Mars are producing almost the exact same storms, indeed often bigger storms, than we see on Earth. It might be argued that pressure is smaller on Mars; but so too is kinetic energy. Clearly, as we approach a vacuum, if we are going to see weather events based on pressure differences, there should be at least the same size percent pressure drops to drive them, not smaller ones.  However, most telling is that while the percent drops on Martian dust devils appear to overlap their terrestrial cousins, Viking 1 and 2 almost always saw much larger pressure increases each sol about 7:30 AM local time with increases up to 0.62 mbar from the previous hour at that time.

        Figure 4 offers evidence that internal events on the Vikings were having a much greater impact on pressure readings than dramatics events like dust devils. Pressure increases at the 0.26 to 0.3 time-bins were comparable to pressure drops associated with global dust storms. An increase of 0.62 mbar in about 59 minutes that makes up one time-bin equates to a pressure rise 13 times greater than the largest (0.477 mbar) pressure fall shown for all 79 Pathfinder dust devil events, and about 21 times greater than the largest (.0289 mbar) pressure drop seen for a Phoenix dust devil.

Figure 3 – Pressure drops at Phoenix and Pathfinder during dust devils (adapted from Elohoj et al.)

Figure 4 below – Relative magnitude of 0.62 mbar increase in pressure for Viking 1 at its sol 332.3 and pressure drops or 79 convective vortices/dust devils at Mars pathfinder over its 83 sols.

Table 1 (below) – Pressure at various elevation on Mars based on a scale height of 10.8 and a pressure at Mars Areoid of 6.1 mbar. Atmospheric pressure decreases exponentially with altitude. In determining pressure for Earth, the formula for scale height is p = p0e-(h/h0) where p = atmospheric pressure (measured in bars on Earth), h = height (altitude), P0 = pressure at height h = 0 (surface pressure), and H0 = scale height. Elevations at geographic sites are based largely on http://ssed.gsfc.nasa.gov/tharsis/geodesy.html

 

1.2. NASA Ames Test of Martian Pressures and Dust Devils 

In effort was made at the Ames facility to simulate Martian dust devils at a pressure of 10 mbar.  NASA (2005 article) states that, “The high-pressure air draws thin air through the tunnel like a vacuum cleaner sucks air. Scientists also compare this process to a person sucking water through a straw. The resulting simulated Mars wind moves at about 230 feet per second (70 m/s).”  Actual recorded Martian dust devil wind velocities seen by Pathfinder and Phoenix were about 6 m/s on Mars (Ellohoj et al., 2009).  Seventy m/s is 156.8 miles per hour, nearly the strength of a category 5 hurricane.  NASA Ames was unable to replicate the dust devil with a fan spinning at the 10 mbar pressure level. They state that “the simulated (10 mbar) Martian atmosphere in the wind tunnel is so tenuous that a fan would have to spin at too high a speed to blow thin wind through the test section.” As such, it becomes harder to accept that dust devils can occur in such low pressures. The problem becomes more severe when we see Martian dust devils operating at even lower speeds, or on Arsia Mons where pressure is ~1 mbar (see Table 1).

.

This report is continued in at Mars Report Part 2.