TAVIS FAILURE ANALYSIS
Note: while most Tavis transducers did not fail, the point of including this report on my web site is that nothing in the report refers to dust, which I believe is a major source for failure of transducers on Mars.
Source: found on-line in conjunction with foia.msfc.nasa.gov/docs/praca/A15483.doc.
| MSFC Problem Reporting and Corrective Action (PRACA) System |
| WHOLE RECORD REPORT( + ADDENDUM) |
| MSFC Record # | In-Flight Anomaly Number | Contractor Report Number | JSC# | KSC# | |
| Problem Title | |||||
| EICN# | ELEMENT | Contractor | FSCM# | FCRIT | |
| HCRIT | Sys_Lvl | Misc Codes | |||
| HARDWARE | NOMENCLATURE | PART# | SER/LOT# | MANUFACTURER | |
| HARDWARE | NOMENCLATURE | PART# | SER/LOT# | MANUFACTURER | |
| HARDWARE | NOMENCLATURE | PART# | SER/LOT# | MANUFACTURER | |
| Test/Operation | Prevailing Condtion | F / U | Fail Mode | Cause | |
| System | Defect | Material | Work Contact | Fail Date | |
| Received at MSFC | Date Isolated | FMEA Reference | IFA: Mission Phase | Mission Elapsed Time | |
| Location | Symptom | Time Cycle | |||
| Effectivity Text | |||||
| Vehicle Effectivity Codes | |||||
| Vehicle 1 | Vehicle 2 | Vehicle 3 | Vehicle 4 | Vehicle 5 | |
| Mission Effectivity Codes | |||||
| Mssn 1 | Mssn 2 | Mssn 3 | Mssn 4 | Mssn 5 | |
| Estimated Completion Dates | |||||
| MSFC Approved Defer Until Date | Contractor Req Defer Until Date | LVL 3 Close | Remark / Action | ||
| Investigation / Resolution Summary | |||||
| Last MSFC Update | CN RSLV SBMT | Defer Date | Add Date | R/C Codes | |
| Assignee | |||||
| Design | Chief Engineer | S & MA | Project | Project MGR | |
| Approval | |||||
| Design | Chief Engineer | S & MA | Project | Project MGR | |
| PAC Assignee | PAC Review Complete | MSFC Closure Date | Status | F/A Completion | |
| Problem Type | SEV | Program Name | REVL | OPRINC | |
| FUNC MOD | Software Effectivity | Software Fail CD | SUBTYPE | Software Closure CD | |
| RES PERSON L2 | Approval Signature L3 | ||||
| Related Document Type | Related Document ID | ||||
| Related Document Title | |||||
| Related Document Type | Related Document ID | ||||
| Related Document Title | |||||
| Related Document Type | Related Document ID | ||||
| Related Document Title | |||||
| Contractor Status Summary | |||||
| Reliability/Quality Assurance Concerns, Recommendations: | |||||
| Problem Description A LOX ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER FAILED A TEST OF OUTPUT VOLTAGEVERSUS APPLIED PRESSURE DURING ACCEPTANCE TESTING OF ET-65/LWT-58FAILURE ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSDUCER, COMPLETED JUNE 15, 1993,IDENTIFIED THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE FAILURE AS A DEFECTIVE TRANSISTORTHE NATURE OF THE TRANSISTOR DEFECT INDICATES A LOT RELATED PROBLEMTHE TRACING OF ALL USES OF THE DEFECTIVE LOT OF TRANSISTORS WASRECEIVED ON JUNE 17, 1993CRITICALITY: THE PD7400239-009 TRANSDUCERS ARE USED ON ET-64/SUBSEQUENT AND ARE CRIT. 3; FMEA ITEM CODE 3.2.1.1C, "FAILS WITH HIGHREADING;" AND FMEA ITEM CODE 3.2.1.2C, "FAILS WITH LOW READING."NOTE: THE TRANSDUCERS ARE LIMITED LIFE CONTROLLEDPREVIOUS CAPS: CAPS E-132, E-133, AND E-141 ADDRESSED UNRELATEDPROBLEMS WITH PD7400239 TRANSDUCERSREVISION "E" CLOSES ALL TASKS. SEE ASTERISKS FOR CHANGES | |||||
| Contractor Investigation/Resolution GENERAL:A LOX ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER INSTALLED ON ET-65/LWT-58 FAILED ATEST OF THE ACCURACY OF THE OUTPUT VOLTAGE PRESSURE VERSUS THE APPLIEDPRESSURE. THE TEST, TP7C201-AT, WAS BEING PERFORMED IN THE MAFBUILDING 420, FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND TEST WORK AREATHE TRANSDUCER WAS A PART NUMBER 80931003731-009, SERIAL NUMBER 28,INSTALLED ON THE ET IN THE REFERENCE DESIGNATOR 327A04 POSITION. ATAN APPLIED PRESSURE OF 21.006 PSIG, THE OUTPUT VOLTAGE WAS 3.581 VDCTHE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE OUTPUT VOLTAGE AT THAT PRESSURE IS 3.560 VDCTHE 0.021 VDC OUT-OF-TOLERANCE CONDITION IS EQUIVALENT TO AN ERROR OF0.4% OF FULL SCALE. THE 80931003731-009 TRANSDUCER IS AN ASSEMBLY OF APD4800280-019 METAL SCREEN FILTER INSTALLED ON THE REFERENCE PORT OF APD7400239-009 PRESSURE TRANSDUCER. THE PD7400239 TRANSDUCER, SERIALNUMBER 85, USED IN THIS ASSEMBLY HAD AN OUTPUT VOLTAGE THAT WAS LOWERBY 0.9% AT 21 PSIG DURING THE ORIGINAL SUPPLIER ACCEPTANCE TESTTHE TRANSDUCER WAS RETURNED TO THE SUPPLIER, TAVIS CORPORATION, FORFAILURE ANALYSIS. THE TRANSDUCER IS A HERMETICALLY SEALED DESIGNWITH A TUBULAR STAINLESS STEEL CASE. ANALYSIS PROVED DIFFICULT ASTHE FAILURE WAS INTERMITTENT AND VARIABLE IN NATURE. THE ANALYSISAT TAVIS CONCLUDED IN APRIL 1993, BY IDENTIFYING A DEFECTIVETRANSISTOR. THE DEFECTIVE TRANSISTOR WAS SENT TO THE MARTINMARIETTA ASTRONAUTICS GROUP IN DENVER, COLORADO,FOR FURTHERANALYSISTHE DEFECTIVE TRANSISTOR WAS A 2N2946A JANTXV, PRODUCED BY TELEDYNECRYSTALONICS, LOT CODE 8619. IT WAS FOUND TO HAVE EXCESSIVEELECTRICAL LEAKAGE AT ALL TEMPERATURES; THE GREATEST OUT OFTOLERANCE CONDITION OCCURRED AT 75 DEGREE F. TESTING FOUND THETRANSISTOR CASE HERMETICITY WAS WITHIN SPECIFICATION. RESIDUAL GASANALYSIS (RGA) OF THE CONTENTS OF THE HERMETICALLY SEALED CASEFOUND THE MOISTURE CONTENT WAS 6.79%; THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE VALUEIS 0.5%. FOLLOWING RGA, WITH THE MOISTURE HAVING BEEN REMOVED, THETRANSISTOR NO LONGER HAD EXCESSIVE ELECTRICAL LEAKAGE. EXCESSIVEINTERNAL MOISTURE INDICATES LOSS OF CONTROL DURING THEMANUFACTURING PROCESS AND BRINGS INTO QUESTION THE RELIABILITY OFTHE ASSOCIATED PRODUCTION LOTTAVIS CORPORATION IDENTIFIED ALL PARTS PRODUCED FOR MARTIN MARIETTAMANNED SPACE SYSTEMS WHICH USED THE SAME LOT OF TELEDYNECRYSTALONICS TRANSISTORS AS THAT IN THE ORIGINAL FAILURE; LOT CODE8619. A TOTAL OF TWENTY-SEVEN PD7400239-009/80931003731-009 LOX ULLAGEPRESSURE TRANSDUCERS ARE AFFECTED. A TOTAL OF THIRTY PD7400239-019 LH2ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS ARE AFFECTED. THE LH2 TRANSDUCERS WEREDEVELOPED TO REPLACE THE EXISTING PD7400098-089 PARTS BUT HAVE NEVERBEEN QUALIFIED FOR FLIGHTTASK I. FAILURE INVESTIGATION A ENGINEERING IS REVIEWING THE LOX ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER TEST DATA TAKEN IN MAF BLDG. 420 ON THE ETS WHICH HAVE THE 80931003731-009 TRANSDUCERS. THE DATA WILL BE COMPARED WITH THE LAST SUPPLIER CALIBRATION TESTS TO DETERMINE IF THE TRANSDUCERS HAVE CHANGED RESPONSIBILITY: L. COLON/4120--J. COOL/4120 COMPLETE: JUNE 28, 1993 CLOSURE STATEMENT SEVERAL OF THE EIGHTEEN INSTALLED AND TESTED TRANSDUCERS HAD MINOR CHANGES IN THE OUTPUT VOLTAGE AS COMPARED TO THE SUPPLIER ATP. ANY ACTIONS NECESSARY WILL BE ADDRESSED FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE OTHER FAILURE INVESTIGATION TASKS B PURCHASING IS OBTAINING FROM TAVIS CORPORATION THE TRACEABILITY DATA ON THE 2N2946A TRANSISTORS USED IN ALL TRANSDUCERS OTHER THAN THOSE INVOLVED WITH THE SUSPECT LOT RESPONSIBILITY: G. PICHON/3830 M. COMBS/3830 COMPLETE: JUNE 28, 1993 CLOSURE STATEMENT TWENTY-FOUR PD7400239-009/80931003731-009 LOX ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS AND TWENTY-TWO PD7400239-019 LH2 ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS WERE IDENTIFIED WITH THE LOT CODES OF TRANSISTORS C ALL PD7400239 LOX AND LH2 ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS IN MAF STORES WERE DOCUMENTED ON MARS AS BEING SUSPECT OF BEING INACCURATE AND WILL BE RETURNED TO TAVIS FOR TESTING. THIRTY LOX TRANSDUCERS WERE DOCUMENTED ON MARS T-127791. FIFTY-TWO LH2 TRANSDUCERS WERE DOCUMENTED ON MARS T-127790 RESPONSIBILITY: J. ADAMS/3741--D. WESTPHAL/3740 COMPLETE: JUNE 28, 1993 D TESTING OF THE PD7400239 LOX AND LH2 ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS AT TAVIS WILL CONSIST OF THE POST-VIBRATION PORTION OF THE SUPPLIER ATP RESPONSIBILITY: G. PICHON/3830--M. COMBS/3830 L. COLON/4120--J. COOL/4120 COMPLETE: NOVEMBER 30, 1993 CLOSURE STATEMENT 1. THIRTY LOX PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS WERE TESTED AT TAVIS CORPORATION: A. TEN TRANSDUCERS WERE FOUND TO HAVE SMALL ERRORS IN OUTPUT VOLTAGE AND WERE DOCUMENTED ON MARS T-121303 AND T- 121304 THE TRANSDUCERS HAVE BEEN DISPOSITIONED TO BE READJUSTED AND RETURNED TO MAF B. ONE TRANSDUCER HAD GALLED THREADS ON THE REFERENCE PORT FITTING, AS A RESULT OF FILTER REMOVAL FOR TESTING, AND WAS DOCUMENTED ON MARS T-121306. THE TRANSDUCER WAS DISPOSITIONED "USE-AS-IS." C. ONE TRANSDUCER HAD AN OUTPUT VOLTAGE ERROR SIMILAR TO THAT OF THE ORIGINAL FAILURE WHICH OPENED THIS CAPS. THE TRANSDUCER WAS DOCUMENTED ON MARS T-121302 AND DISPOSITIONED FOR FAILURE ANALYSIS TO BE PERFORMED; SEE TASK I.G. BELOW 2. FIFTY TWO LH2 PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS WERE TESTED AT TAVIS CORPORATION: A. TWO TRANSDUCERS WERE FOUND TO HAVE SMALL ERRORS IN OUTPUT VOLTAGE AND WERE DOCUMENTED ON MARS T-121305.THE TRANSDUCERS WILL BE READJUSTED AND RETURNED TO MAF B. ONE TRANSDUCER HAD AN OUTPUT VOLTAGE ERROR AND WAS DOCUMENTED ON MARS T121307. THE MARS WAS DISPOSITIONED FOR FAILURE ANALYSIS; SEE TASK I.I BELOW E NINETEEN TELEDYNE CRYSTALONICS TRANSISTORS FROM TAVIS STOCK ARE BEING TESTED TO DETERMINE THEIR CONDITION. THE TRANSISTORS ARE NEW UNITS WHICH HAVE BEEN UPGRADED BY TEST TO LEVEL "S" FOR USE IN THE PD7400239 TRANSDUCERS. EIGHTEEN OF THE TRANSISTORS ARE FROM THE SAME LOT CODE AS THE ORIGINAL FAILURE. THE TESTING IS BEING PERFORMED AT THE MARTIN MARIETTA ASTRONAUTICS GROUP IN DENVER, COLORADO RESPONSIBILITY: G. PICHON/3830--M. COMBS/3830 L. COLON/4120-- J. COOL/4120 COMPLETE: AUGUST 12. 1993 CLOSURE STATEMENT ALL NINETEEN TRANSISTORS PASSED THE ELECTRICAL PERFORMANCE TESTS. RESIDUAL GAS ANALYSIS OF FOURTEEN TRANSISTORS FOUND ONE UNIT THAT WAS NOT HERMETICALLY SEALED AND TWO WHICH HAD EXCESSIVE LEVELS OF MOISTURE. ONE OF THE TWO TRANSISTORS WITH EXCESSIVE MOISTURE WAS THE LOT CODE 8611 PART. THE GIDEP ALERT WAS REVISED TO INCLUDE THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND LOT CODE; SEE TASK II.A F ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPT. 4120, WILL RECOMMEND A COURSE OF ACTION FOR THE TRANSDUCER PROBLEMS BASED ON AN EVALUATION OF THE DATA FROM THE TRANSDUCERS IN TASK I.D., THE TRANSISTORS IN TASK I.E., AND THE RESULTS OF THE FAILURE ANALYSES IN TASK I.G AND TASK I.I RESPONSIBILITY: G. PICHON/3830--M. COMBS/3830 L. COLON/4120-- J. COOL/4120 * COMPLETED: JANUARY 17, 1994 CLOSURE STATEMENT 1. REVIEW OF THE TRANSDUCER TEST DATA FROM THIRTY LOX AND FIFTY-TWO LH2 PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS, OBTAINED AS PART OF I.D., FOUND NO INDICATION OF PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INDIVIDUAL LOT OF TRANSISTORS *2. REVIEW OF THE TEST DATA FROM TASK I.D., FOUND THAT THE TRANSDUCERS HAD SMALL, BUT UNEXPECTED, CHANGES IN THE CALIBRATION DATA WHEN COMPARED WITH THE ORIGINAL ATP DATA. AS A RESULT, TEN LH2 PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS WERE SELECTED BY ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING TO BE TESTED FOR LONG TERM (LIFE) STABILITY OF THE PD7400239 DESIGN. SEE TASK I.H *3. THE FAILURES COVERED BY TASK I.G. AND TASK I.I. WERE THE RESULT OF WORKMANSHIP/QUALITY ESCAPES AND WERE JUDGED TO HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF THE TRANSDUCERS G. FAILURE ANALYSIS T-121302 IS IN PROGRESS AT TAVIS CORPORATION THE FAILED PART IS A LOX TRANSDUCER, P/N 80931003731-009, S/N 0000020, AND UTILIZES TRANSISTORS WITH THE SAME LOT CODE THAT WAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORIGINAL FAILURE RESPONSIBILITY: G. PICHON/3830--M. COMBS/3830 J. ADAMS/3741--D. WESTPHAL/3740 COMPLETE: NOVEMBER 9, 1993 CLOSURE STATEMENT ANALYSIS FOUND THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE TO BE A DEFECTIVE SOLDER JOINT BETWEEN A CIRCUIT BOARD TERMINAL AND ONE OF THE LEADS TO A DIAPHRAGM POSITION SENSING INDUCTOR. THE WIRE HAD BEEN WRAPPED ONTO THE TERMINAL BUT HAD NOT BEEN SOLDERED. THE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES INSPECT THE SOLDER JOINTS. THE DEFECT IS THE RESULT OF A QUALITY CONTROL ESCAPE AT TAVIS CORP H.AN ENGINEERING TEST PROGRAM TO DETERMINE THE LONG TERM STABILITY OF THE TRANSDUCERS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. TEN LH2 ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS, PART NUMBER PD7400239-019, WERE SELECTED BY ENGINEERING FROM AMONG THE FIFTY-TWO PARTS NOW EXISTING. THE TRANSDUCERS ARE TO BE TESTED FOR ACCURACY AT 90 DAY INTERVALS UNTIL THE FIRST FLIGHT OF AN ET WITH PD7400239-009 TRANSDUCERS THEREAFTER, THE TEN TRANSDUCERS WILL BE TESTED AT 180 DAY INTERVALS UNTIL THE PARTS ARE FIVE YEARS OLD (I.E. DECEMBER 1996) THE TESTING IS CONTROLLED BY OPERATIONS DIRECTIVE 93-OD-0643 I. A PD7400239-019 LH2 ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER, SERIAL NUMBER 0000065, FAILED THE TESTS AT TAVIS CORP DOCUMENTED IN TASK I.D THE TRANSDUCER OUTPUT WAS 676MV REGARDLESS OF APPLIED PRESSURE, AT AN OPERATING TEMPERATURE OF 150 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT. THE TRANSDUCER WILL BE DOCUMENTED ON MARS T-121307 AND DISPOSITIONED FOR FAILURE ANALYSIS RESPONSIBILITY: G. PICHON/3830--M. COMBS/3830 J. ADAMS/3741--D. WESTPHAL/3740 * COMPLETE: JANUARY 17, 1994 * CLOSURE STATEMENT ANALYSIS FOUND THAT THE INSULATION ON A WIRE HAD BEEN DAMAGED AND WAS CAUSING A SHORT CIRCUIT BETWEEN TRANSDUCER COMPONENTS. THE DAMAGE WAS THE RESULT OF A WORKMANSHIP/QUALITY ESCAPE WHICH IMPROPERLY POSITIONED THE WIRE IN THE ASSEMBLY TASK CLOSEDCAUSEORIGINAL FAILURE - THE TRANSISTOR WAS DEFECTIVE AS SUPPLIED FROM THE MANUFACTURERPROBLEMS DISCOVERED DURING THE TASK I INVESTIGATION - SEE TASK II CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR DETAILSTASK II. CORRECTIVE ACTION A. THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR THE DEFECTIVE TRANSISTORS ARE LISTED BELOW. REVIEW BY ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, TASK I,F.1., DID NOT RECOMMEND FURTHER ACTIONS 1. GIDEP ALERT 9Q-A-93-03 WAS ORIGINALLY RELEASED BY THE GIDEP SYSTEM AND WAS BASED ON THE SINGLE ORIGINAL DEFECTIVE TRANSISTOR. THE ALERT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY REVISED TO 9Q-A-93-03A TO INCLUDE INFORMATION ON OTHER FAILURES DISCOVERED AS PART OF TASK I.E RESPONSIBILITY: B. CORNAY/3742 D. WESTPHAL/3740 COMPLETE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1993 2. SCAD 92-132 WAS ISSUED TO TAVIS CORP RESPONSIBILITY: T. PASTORET/3742--D. WESTPHAL/3740 COMPLETE: JULY 29, 1993 *B. CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR THE CHANGES IN THE TRANSDUCER CALIBRATIONS, IDENTIFIED DURING ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING REVIEW OF TEST DATA IN TASK I.F.2., WAS ADDRESSED BY INSTITUTING A LONG TERM TEST OF TRANSDUCER PERFORMANCE. REFERENCE: TASK I.H AND OPERATION DIRECTIVE 93-OD-0643. SHOULD THE TEST RESULTS INDICATE THAT FURTHER ACTION IS NECESSARY, IT WILL BE ADDRESSED BY ENGINEERING CHANGES *C. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR THE FAILURE CAUSED BY A WIRE CONNECTION WHICH HAD NOT BEEN SOLDERED WERE TO REVISE THE SOLDER INSPECTION CRITERIA OF THE MANUFACTURING TRAVELERS AT THE APPLICABLE STAGE OF ASSEMBLY. REFERENCE: TAVIS CORPORATION TEST TRAVELER 10345-1, STEP 340, FOR THE PD7400239-009; AND TAVIS CORPORATION PRODUCTION TEST TRAVELER 10346-1, STEP 330, FOR THE PD7400239-019 *D CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR THE FAILURE CAUSED BY DAMAGED WIRE INSULATION WERE TO REVISE THE MANUFACTURING TRAVELERS, ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, AND TO CREATE A TOOL TO CONTROL THE ASSEMBLY AND PREVENT NICKED WIRES 1. PD7400239-009 LOX TRANSDUCER; TAVIS CORPORATION PRODUCTION TEST TRAVELER 10345-1, STEP 240, ALIGNMENT TOOL #T0215; TAVIS CORPORATION PRODUCTION TEST TRAVELER 10345-1, STEP 350, WIRE ROUTING; AND TAVIS CORPORATION ENGINEERING DRAWING 18131, REVISION C., DOCUMENTATION ACCOUNTABILITY SHEET (DAS) BBE-061 2. PD7400239-019 LH2 TRANSDUCER: TAVIS CORPORATION PRODUCTION TEST TRAVELER 10346-1, STEP 230, ALIGNMENT TOO #T0215; TAVIS CORPORATION PRODUCTION TEST TRAVELER 10346-1, STEP 340, WIRE ROUTING; AND TAVIS CORPORATION ENGINEERING DRAWING 18913, REVISION B., DOCUMENTATION ACCOUNTABILITY SHEET (DAS) BBG-056TASK CLOSEDTASK III. CLEARANCE OF EFFECTIVITIES ALL ETS CLEARED. TESTING OF THE EIGHTY-TWO PD7400239 TRANSDUCERS, NOT INSTALLED ON ETS, FOUND NO INDICATION OF A TRANSISTOR LOT RELATED PROBLEM. REVIEW OF THE TEST DATA FROM TRANSDUCERS INSTALLED ON ETS FOUND NO INDICATION OF A TRANSISTOR LOT RELATED PROBLEM. REVIEW OF THE TEST DATA FROM TRANSDUCERS INSTALLED ON ETS FOUND NO INDICATION OF A TRANSISTOR LOT RELATED PROBLEM. THERE ARE SUFFICIENT TESTS OF TRANSDUCER PERFORMANCE AT THE SUPPLIER, MAF, AND KSC TO ASSURE PERFORMANCE DURING PROPELLANT LOADING AND FLIGHT ETS 64 AND SUBSEQUENT HAVE THREE ACTIVE PD7400239-009 LOX ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS CONNECTED TO THE ORBITER AT A TIME. THE LAUNCH COMMIT CRITERIA (LSS) REQUIRES THAT TWO OF THE THREE BE FUNCTIONING THROUGH THE PRE-PRESS EVENT OF PROPELLANT LOADING. NONE ARE REQUIRED FOR FLIGHTTASK CLOSED*TASK IV. CAPS CLOSURE SUMMARYA FAILURE OF A PD7400239 LOX ULLAGE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER WAS TRACED TOA DEFECTIVE TRANSISTOR. A GIDEP ALERT WAS ISSUED AGAINST THETRANSISTOR LOT AND WAS BACKED BY TESTS OF OTHER TRANSISTORS FROM THESAME LOT. THE MAF TEST DATA FOR ALL INSTALLED TRANSDUCERS WAS REVIEWEDALONG WITH TEST DATA OBTAINED BY RETURNING ALL UNINSTALLED PARTS TOTHE SUPPLIER FOR CALIBRATION TESTING. NO DEFINITE LINK COULD BE FOUNDBETWEEN THE TRANSISTOR LOTS AND THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMPLETEDTRANSDUCERSDURING THE INVESTIGATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIRST FAILURE, THREEOTHER PROBLEMS OCCURRED. THE FIRST WAS CALIBRATION SHIFTS NOTED IN THETRANSDUCERS RETURNED TO THE SUPPLIER. AS A RESULT OF SHIFTS, A LONGTERM TEST HAS BEEN INITIATED TO VERIFY TRANSDUCER STABILITY. THESECOND AND THIRD PROBLEMS WERE TWO SEPARATE TRANSDUCER FAILURESRESULTING FROM WORKMANSHIP ESCAPES DURING TRANSDUCER MANUFACTURETHESE FAILURES WERE ADDRESSED BY PLACING ADDITIONAL CONTROLS IN THESUPPLIERS MANUFACTURING TRAVELERS AND DRAWINGSTASK CLOSEDTHIS CAPS IS CLOSED. NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED | |||||
| MSFC Response/Concurrence | |||||
| MSFC Problem Reporting and Corrective Action (PRACA) System |
| ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM REPORT |
| MSFC Report# | IFA# | Contractor RPT# | JSC# | KSC# | EICN# |
| Asmnt Part# | Asmnt Part Name | Asmnt Serial/Lot# | |||
| HCRIT CD | FCRIT CD | CAUSE CD | FAIL MODE | ||
| Asmnt FMEA | Asmnt FM | FMEA CSE | FMEA SCSE | ||
| Asmnt FMEA | Asmnt FM | FMEA CSE | FMEA SCSE | ||
| Asmnt FMEA | Asmnt FM | FMEA CSE | FMEA SCSE | ||
| Correlated Part# | Correlated Part# | Correlated Part# | |||
| Associated LRU# | Associated LRU# | Associated LRU# | |||
| MAJOR DESIGN CHANGES | |||||
| APRV DATE | DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES | ||||
| ASSESSMENT TEXT | |||||